Re: Packets that should have been DNATted appearing in INPUT table

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 07:00:40PM +0100, Marius Mertens wrote:
> first of all, please cc me in your answer as I am not a subscriber of this 
> list.

always a great way to start a post...

<snip>

does your DNAT work or not?

-j

--
"What's the point of going out, we're just going to end up back
 here anyway?"
        --The Simpsons


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux