iptables & ifconfig wrong packet accounting

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: netfilter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: iptables & ifconfig wrong packet accounting
From: jorge alonso <livebrain@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 06:21:34 +0000
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=C029ja9jMoFWpSbevpau04ylWGfzBj06C6kTnz9qOt33FcEo3kl9zJogBvY96ENeJY5jCozIlpeffkTXlvegemBI9+6sWznDBNQYIbc6j0HPZMu1O+/YY1pbRP7H+g3gjyKKmNPusg1jkvKeRs39PBVbYEmNg/FdoYUP3s3DAws=
Reply-to: jorge alonso <livebrain@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netfilter-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

i'm trying to do traffic accounting with iptables but the received
packets from iptables (iptables -L -v) and packets from ifconfig dont
match.
ifconfig counts more packets is it normal ?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: iptables & ifconfig wrong packet accounting
  - From: Jason Opperisano

Prev by Date: Re: pptp conntrack patch missing argument
Next by Date: About PPPTP CALLER ID MASQ on Linux router
Previous by thread: Re: Best performance: 2 cards, one on each PCI-X bus, 2 cards on one PCI-X bus, or a single card with two interfaces?
Next by thread: Re: iptables & ifconfig wrong packet accounting
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Netfilter Development] [Linux Kernel Networking Development] [Netem] [Berkeley Packet Filter] [Linux Kernel Development] [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control] [Bugtraq]

Powered by Linux