---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: hArTh0 hArTh0 <harth0@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 11:05:32 +0200 Subject: Re: Newbie Q: Forcing p2p traffic via one interface on a dual homed system. To: Jason Opperisano <opie@xxxxxxxxxxx> Hmmm I see what you mean. I guess the ipp2p module is normally used to prioritise traffic rather than re-route it. Could some one suggest an appropriate general strategy that I could use solve my original problem i.e. selectively force p2p traffic to traverse ppp1? Regards, H On Sun, 28 Nov 2004 20:33:46 -0500, Jason Opperisano <opie@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sun, 2004-11-28 at 15:38, hArTh0 hArTh0 wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > My first post to this group and be warned I am a new linux user ;) > > > > My setup: > > > > -----ISP1---ppp0----Router-----MainPC > > -----ISP2---ppp1-------| > > > > Router ip: 192.168.0.1 > > MainPC ip: 192.168.0.10 > > ppp0: 165.165.89.171 > > ppp1: 165.146.132.124 > > > > What I want to achieve is that all p2p traffic passes through ppp1 > > while everthing else goes through ppp0. > > > > My approach to date: Use http://www.ipp2p.org to mark all p2p packets > > and then attempt to use this mark to get these packets to leave via > > ppp1. > > your question sounds just like: > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=netfilter&m=109853391328421&w=2 > > answer is still the same: > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=netfilter&m=109866874632386&w=2 > > -j > > -- > "Me lose brain? Uh, oh! Ha ha ha! Why I laugh?" > --The Simpsons > >
