Re: Netfilter vs commercial

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2004-08-09 at 12:48, Mike O wrote:
> John,
> 
> Would you mind elaborating on your comment about Netfilter's stateful engine 
> being weaker than Checkpoint's? and how would the window tracking patch make 
> it more secure. We have checkpoint here and have ran into problems, where 
> checkpoint has limited us in the way we do things here and I have always 
> wanted to implement netfilter but couldn't because it's open source.
<snip>
I would imagine that you could find "commercial" products that are using
iptables and thus get around the open source problem.  Astaro, SnapGear
and iKloak come to mind.  I believe some WatchGuard models are based
upon iptables.  There are also some other smaller players such as
SmoothWall (in the UK), Kyzo, NetMAX and NetMaster.
-- 
John A. Sullivan III
Chief Technology Officer
Nexus Management
+1 207-985-7880
john.sullivan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
---
If you are interested in helping to develop a GPL enterprise class
VPN/Firewall/Security device management console, please visit
http://iscs.sourceforge.net 



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux