RE: ports 137 to 139

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2004-07-21 at 08:51, Piszcz, Justin Michael wrote:
> I do not see the need for it either, why would you (or he even suggest
> to) have it open?
> 

This person is probably not really a friend ;). It is probably best to
silently drop 135,137:139,445 due to the number of scans that out on the
internet from viruses, worms, script kidz, and real bad-guys.

> 
-- 
Stephen John Smoogen		smoogen@xxxxxxxx
Los Alamos National Lab  CCN-5 Sched 5/40  PH: 4-0645
Ta-03 SM-1498 MailStop B255 DP 10S  Los Alamos, NM 87545
-- "We cannot have a free government without elections; and if the
-- rebellion could force us to forgo, or postpone, a national election,
-- it might fairly claim to have already conquered us." Abraham Lincoln



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux