On Mon, Jul 19, 2004 at 10:12:04AM +0100, Antony Stone wrote: > On Sunday 18 July 2004 11:10 pm, Mail Lists wrote: > > > iptables -A INPUT -s 1.0.0.0/7 -i eth1 -j cRES_LDROP > > iptables -A INPUT -s 173.0.0.0/5 -i eth1 -j cRES_LDROP > > iptables -A INPUT -s 181.0.0.0/6 -i eth1 -j cRES_LDROP > > iptables -A INPUT -s 185.0.0.0/7 -i eth1 -j cRES_LDROP > > iptables -A INPUT -s 189.0.0.0/7 -i eth1 -j cRES_LDROP > > The first first octet of all the above addresses is an odd number; therefore > the LSB = 1, therefore any netmask shorter than 8 bits is inappropriate. Indeed - wacky list - will fix - I'm assuming that might cause problems. Looks like 173/5 is an attempt to represent is 173/8 thru 180/8 for example. Will repair asap. Thanks kindly' gene/ > > Regards, > > Antony. > > -- > RTFM may be the appropriate reply, but please specify exactly which FM to R. > > Please reply to the list; > please don't CC me.
