On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 08:23:20PM +0200, Jozsef Kadlecsik wrote: > Hi Harald, > > Surely, you should know about this. Even when "SpamCop is aggressive and > often errs". Thanks, Jozsef. > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 19:12:23 +0200 > From: Marc Haber <mh+netfilter@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > To: netfilter <netfilter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: Netfiler on RBL > > On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 01:03:33PM -0400, David Cary Hart wrote: > > Jul 15 10:56:03 mail postfix/smtpd[18286]: connect from > > lakshmi.netfilter.org[62.128.28.23] > > Jul 15 10:56:03 mail postfix/smtpd[18286]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from > > lakshmi.netfilter.org[62.128.28.23]: 554 Service unavailable; Client > > host [62.128.28.23] blocked using bl.spamcop.net; Blocked - see > > http://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?62.128.28.23; > > http://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml says "However, it should be noted that > SpamCop is aggressive and often errs on the side of blocking mail". > You don't want to use any list that bases its result on user reports > for blocking. yes, I know about this. I automatically receive lots of nagios tickets about this. It also isn't the first time this happens to us. To be honest, I don't really care about spamcop. > Greetings > Marc -- - Harald Welte <laforge@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> http://www.netfilter.org/ ============================================================================ "Fragmentation is like classful addressing -- an interesting early architectural error that shows how much experimentation was going on while IP was being designed." -- Paul Vixie
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
