Re: Fwd: Re: Help with ICMP Ruls

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thursday 15 July 2004 8:55 pm, Real Cucumber wrote:

> I do have a state rule already for allowing any
> established,related connections.

In that case you are already allowing ICMP :)

> So should I add another one such as:
>
> iptables -A FORWARD -p icmp -m state --state RELATED
> -j ACCEPT

No.   ICMP messages which are RELATED to the existing SSH connections will get 
matched by the final rule in this section of your rules:

# Allow previously initiated and accepted connections
# to bypass firewall tests (state matching)
iptables -A INPUT -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT
iptables -A OUTPUT -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT
iptables -A FORWARD -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT

Just out of interest, why do you have the first two of these rules, if you 
have no INPUT or OUTPUT traffic?

Regards,

Antony.

-- 
Microsoft may sell more software than any other company, but McDonald's sell 
more burgers than any other company, and I think the other similarities are 
obvious...

                                                     Please reply to the list;
                                                           please don't CC me.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux