Re: DNAT problem / question

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 18 Jun 2004 17:06:28 +0100
Antony Stone <Antony@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> You have specified an inappropriate combination of address and netmask with 
> 172.25.239.220/27 - the address 220 is not the base address of a /27 range, 
> and it is possible (I am not certain) that this combination is confusing 
> netfilter.
I don't think this is a problem. They'll be masked out anyway.

Leslie


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux