On Tuesday 16 March 2004 1:20 pm, Luis Hernán Otegui wrote: > I manage a network with a proxy server (running SQUID and IPTABLES, kernel > 2.4.18-14) which used to have two NICs, both networks attached to those > NICs with public IP addresses. Recently, we had to put a third NIC in the > proxy, with private reserved (10.0.0.x) addresses. So, we had to masquerade > all the traffic from the two "internal" networks. Here's the diagram: > > INTERNET > | (public IPs network(A)) > | / > (corporative LAN)-----(proxy)< > \ > (private IPs network(B)) > > So far, so good, but the point is that I need the servers in the (A) > network to maintain their IPs, since they're well known in the net. And > also we need the hosts in the (B) network to be masqued, since their IPs > cannot be routed over the internet. > My questions are: > a) Are there any way to masquerade only the (B) network? Currently, I have > a line like this in the *nat section of the /etc/sysconfig/iptables file: > -A POSTROUTING -o eth0 -j MASQUERADE > b) Is there any better way to do this? Sure: iptables -A POSTROUTING -o eth0 -s 192.168.0.0/16 -j MASQUERADE Replace 192.168.0.0/16 with whatever describes your network B subnet. Regards, Antony. -- "Reports that say that something hasn't happened are always interesting to me, because as we know, there are known knowns; there are things we know we know. We also know there are known unknowns; that is to say we know there are some things we do not know. But there are also unknown unknowns - the ones we don't know we don't know." - Donald Rumsfeld, US Secretary of Defence Please reply to the list; please don't CC me.