Re: INET_IFACE: Secure to allow traffic from 192.168.x.0/24?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Friday 05 March 2004 11:28 am, Carsten Maass wrote:

> Antony Stone wrote:
> >
> > How did you set up IPsec?   Using FreeS/WAN and Linux kernel 2.4.x?  
> > Using the new built-in IPsec in kernel 2.6.x?   Some other method?   It
> > makes a big difference to what you can filter, and how netfilter sees the
> > packets.
>
> Sorry, i should have bin more specific. Both gateways are Linux boxen
> with kernel 2.4.24, using the KAME IPSec-backport from kernel 2.6 in
> tunnel-mode. Both running netfilter on Debian stable with the
> ipsec-tools and racoon coming from testing:
>
> kernel-source-2.4.24          2.4.24-3
> iptables                      1.2.6a-5
> ipsec-tools                   0.2.2-8
> racoon                        0.2.2-8

I have no experience at using Kame (but I have heard that filtering with 
netfilter using the limited access to packets in the new implementation under 
2.6 is "challenging"...)

Can anyone else help with this configuration?

Antony.

-- 
G- GIT/E d- s+:--(-) a+ C++++$ UL++++$ P+(---)>++ L+++(++++)$ !E W(-) N(-) o? 
w-- O !M V+++(--) !PS !PE Y+ PGP+> t- tv@ b+++ DI++ D--- e++>+++ h++ r@? 5? 
!X- !R K--?

                                                     Please reply to the list;
                                                           please don't CC me.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux