I'm likewise confused. Maybe I'm jumping the gun a bit. I just want to experiment with nfnetlink-ctnetlink-0.13, so perhaps I'll revert to a late 2.4 kernel. Thanks, Terry. >Well it looks like patch-o-matic-ng doesn't support 2.6 yet. I find it >very confusing. The only information I found on kernel 2.6 was a very >short "News" from December 2003 which said "expect a patch-o-matic-ng >which will support 2.6". Which led me to think NG would work on 2.6 but >alas not yet. > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: T. Horsnell (tsh) [mailto:tsh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] >> Sent: 19 February 2004 15:41 >> To: netfilter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Subject: p.o.m-ng+linux-2.6.2+ctnetlink >> >> Problem using patch-o-matic-ng-20040217 to patch kernel 2.6.2 >> and iptables-1.2.9, to include the nfnetlink-ctnetlink-0.13 patch. >> >> When I use .runme to test this patch, it reports: >> 'Patch nfnetlink-ctnetlink-0.13 applies cleanly' >> When I actually install the patch, it reports errors, >> but installs it anyway. >> >> Re-make of the kernel then fails: >> >> [root@dev1 linux-2.6.2]# make bzImage >> HOSTCC scripts/modpost.o >> HOSTLD scripts/modpost >> make[2]: `scripts/fixdep' is up to date. >> scripts/kconfig/conf -s arch/i386/Kconfig >> net/ipv4/netfilter/Kconfig:593: syntax error, unexpected T_WORD >> net/ipv4/netfilter/Kconfig:595: invalid menu option >> make[2]: *** [silentoldconfig] Error 1 >> make[1]: *** [silentoldconfig] Error 2 >> make: *** [include/linux/autoconf.h] Error 2 >> >> Any advice? >> >> Cheers, >> Terry. >> >> >> >> >> >> >======================================================================== >= >> Welcome to Patch-o-matic (1.11)! >> >> Kernel: /usr/src/linux-2.6.2 >> Iptables: /usr/src/iptables >> >> Each patch is a new feature: many have minimal impact, some do not. >> Almost every one has bugs, so don't apply what you don't need! >> ------------------------------------------------------- >> Already applied: >> >> Testing nfnetlink-ctnetlink-0.13... not applied >> The nfnetlink-ctnetlink-0.13 patch: >> Author: Harald Welte <laforge@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jay Schulist >> <jschlst@xxxxxxxxx>, >> Status: Under development, but stabilizing now. >> >> Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx> >> >> Add recent work by patrick (notifiers, event messages to userspace. >> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------- >> Do you want to apply this patch [N/y/t/f/a/r/b/w/q/?] t >> Patch nfnetlink-ctnetlink-0.13 applies cleanly >> ----------------------------------------------------------------- >> Do you want to apply this patch [N/y/t/f/a/r/b/w/q/?] y >> ERROR (7 rejects out of 52 hunks) >> >> Excellent! Source trees are ready for compilation. >> >======================================================================== >= >> >> Checking whether the patch was actually installed: >> >> >> >======================================================================== >= >> Welcome to Patch-o-matic (1.11)! >> >> Kernel: /usr/src/linux-2.6.2 >> Iptables: /usr/src/iptables >> >> Each patch is a new feature: many have minimal impact, some do not. >> Almost every one has bugs, so don't apply what you don't need! >> ------------------------------------------------------- >> Already applied: >> >> Testing nfnetlink-ctnetlink-0.13... applied >> >> Excellent! Source trees are ready for compilation. >> >======================================================================== >= >> > > >
