Re: Multihomed firewall and port forwarding nightmare ))):-(

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wednesday 14 January 2004 10:43 pm, Caracal - G. Hostettler wrote:

> I did, just to be sure, removed two NICs and assigned the three IPs to the
> remaining one.
> Changed rules accordingly (just changing the ifaces names).
>
> Got exactly the same behavior. So the problem do not seem to be a routing
> problem.

I'm not convinced (sorry).   Why do you have defaults routes pointing both 
internally and externally?   That seems wrong to me.

(From your original email...)

> Kernel IP routing table
> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
> 195.65.176.160 * 255.255.255.248 U 0 0 0 eth1
> 195.65.176.160 * 255.255.255.248 U 0 0 0 eth2
> 195.65.176.160 * 255.255.255.248 U 0 0 0 eth3
> localnet * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0
> default 195.65.176.161 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth3
> default 195.65.176.161 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth2
> default 195.65.176.161 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth1
> default 192.168.124.253 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0

Antony.

-- 
Programming is a Dark Art, and it will always be. The programmer is
fighting against the two most destructive forces in the universe:
entropy and human stupidity. They're not things you can always
overcome with a "methodology" or on a schedule.

 - Damian Conway, Perl God

                                                     Please reply to the list;
                                                           please don't CC me.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux