Re: TTL patch buggy?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 09:54:05PM +0100, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:

> On Wed, 7 Jan 2004, Ramin Dousti wrote:
> 
> > Can you explain (b) a bit more, Harald? Multicast traffic is being
> > dealt with by the routers in exactly the same way as the unicast
> > traffic with regards to the TTL (as far as I understand it).
> 
> Yes, but the difference is that multicast does actually use the ttl to 
> limit the scope of how wide the traffic is distributed, as opposed to most 
> other protocols just using the ttl to kill forwarding loops.

Absolutely. For a sec I forgot all about the dense mode. Thanks, Henrik.
However, I still don't see any "danger" about this. It might not be
desirable but not dangerous, as multicast forwarding has a builtin mechanism
against the loops.

Ramin

> Regards
> Henrik


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux