Antony Stone a écrit :
Yes of course !On Tuesday 23 December 2003 6:37 am, JC wrote:Hello Everybody, I apologize if you've seen something like this but searching on something similar to the subject line above has turned up nill. Scenario HostA ------> FW/NAT -----(port translation) ---> HOSTB (10.10.1.1) (192.168.7.1) Rules: iptables -A PREROUTING -t nat -p tcp --dport 80 -j DNAT --to 192.168.7.1:80 iptables -A FORWARD -p tcp -d 192.168.7.1 --dport 80 -j ACCEPT So everything works, but when HostB goes down for maintence or from a DOS or whatevever FW/NAT will send an ICMP host unreachable with the natted address to HostA. I suppose I'm correct in perceiving that this behavior is normal, so I'll have to ask how do some of you people go about dealing with situations such as these?I don't understand the question. If host B is down, then "host unreachable" is quite correct.
But, the data contains in the ICMP host unreachable messages have the natted IP ....What behaviour would you expect, and what problem do you have with what happens at present?
Antony.
Fabien