On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 11:16:08AM -0500, Jeffrey Laramie wrote: > Interesting. I take it you're referring to the "TEQL" device? Isn't TEQL for loadbalancing (bundling two or more interfaces terminating on the same remote device)? No, I was referring to the "ip ro ..." command which gives you tons of options, including multiple default routes, routing dicision based on other stuff than only the dst addr... > Is this > installed by a kernel module? From the iptables perspective (trying to > stay at least marginally on topic!) if you used this would you use -i > eth0 or -i teql0 to identify the interface? If you bundled eth0 and eth1 to have teql0 then the rules should reference teql0. Also, please note that the TEQL stuff is linux specific (interoperability issues). Ramin > Jeff
