RE: Help with port forwarding

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thus spake Mark E. Donaldson:
> Peter - I don't see anything obvious in the script that could be
> problematic.  What do you mean by "port forwarding not 
> working"? 
When I run the script as shown, I can telnet through any of the filtered
ports (110, 143, 443) on the working PC, but not on the not-working PC.

> Are you
> getting any error messages?  
None whatsoever.  I tried logging the traffic, but nothing showed up.
Interestingly, when I had logging on, it showed various attempts at
port 135:
Oct 21 16:55:45 gw kernel: IN=eth1 OUT=
MAC=00:30:21:07:ef:94:00:02:b9:91:7d:40:08:00 SRC=63.67.218.114
DST=XX.XX.4.7 LEN=64 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=115 ID=44619 DF PROTO=TCP
SPT=4168 DPT=135 WINDOW=64240 RES=0x00 SYN URGP=0
Oct 21 16:55:46 gw kernel: IN=eth1 OUT=
MAC=00:30:21:07:ef:94:00:02:b9:91:7d:40:08:00 SRC=63.67.218.114
DST=XX.XX.4.7 LEN=64 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=115 ID=44889 DF PROTO=TCP
SPT=4168 DPT=135 WINDOW=64240 RES=0x00 SYN URGP=0
Oct 21 16:55:46 gw kernel: IN=eth1 OUT=
MAC=00:30:21:07:ef:94:00:02:b9:91:7d:40:08:00 SRC=63.67.218.114
DST=XX.XX.4.7 LEN=64 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=115 ID=45129 DF PROTO=TCP
SPT=4168 DPT=135 WINDOW=64240 RES=0x00 SYN URGP=0
Oct 21 16:59:23 gw kernel: IN=eth1 OUT=
MAC=00:30:21:07:ef:94:00:02:b9:91:7d:40:08:00 SRC=66.156.169.85
DST=XX.XX.4.7 LEN=48 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=112 ID=47221 DF PROTO=TCP
SPT=2180 DPT=135 WINDOW=16384 RES=0x00 SYN URGP=0
Oct 21 16:59:24 gw kernel: IN=eth1 OUT=
MAC=00:30:21:07:ef:94:00:02:b9:91:7d:40:08:00 SRC=66.156.169.85
DST=XX.XX.4.7 LEN=48 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=112 ID=47351 DF PROTO=TCP
SPT=2180 DPT=135 WINDOW=16384 RES=0x00 SYN URGP=0
[sorry for the long text lines]
But nothing was recorded when I tried to telnet to ports 110, 143 or 443.

> Is translation being performed 
> but the packets
> are not routed?
I'm not sure how to tell that.  Possibly.  Running nmap of the public
address shows:
Starting nmap V. 3.00 ( www.insecure.org/nmap/ )
Interesting ports on  (XX.XX.4.7):
(The 1596 ports scanned but not shown below are in state: closed)
Port       State       Service
22/tcp     open        ssh                     
25/tcp     open        smtp                    
110/tcp    filtered    pop-3                   
143/tcp    filtered    imap2                   
443/tcp    filtered    https

> I might be able to generate some ideas here 
> if you can be
> more specific.
Please let me know what else you need.  I am completely baffled.  Why would
the same
script work on one machine and not the other?  That is why I listed the
lsmod in my
original post.  I wonder if it's something not related to iptables.....?

> By the way, I believe you are meaning to 
> block the Auth
> protocol (port 113):  that being the case, you need to 
> specify TCP and not
> UDP.
Fixed.  Thanks!

Pete


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux