Re: Port forwarding doesn't work.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I almost forgot. You'll need the same line for your FORWARD chain:

iptables -t filter -A FORWARD -p all -m state --state RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT

Jeff


Herman wrote:


On Sunday 12 October 2003 7:17 pm, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
  On Sun, 12 Oct 2003 18:40:27 -0600,
  Herman <Herman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message

  <200310121840.27031.Herman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
  > The real problem that I'm trying to solve is this:
  > Several hosts need to acces a gov service that uses Java and a certain
  > port.

  ..if these hosts are initiating this connection from your end,
  " -j ESTABLISHED,RELATED" should do it, instead of you
  running around chasing your tail.

Hi Arnt,

Could you please elaborate on that?

As far as I can see, the hosts are initiating the connection, but the port must somehow be forwarded through the firewall snat box.

This is what I have:
echo " DNAT Forward port 3270 for Alberta Registries application on Pluto"
$IPTABLES -A FORWARD -i $EXTIF -o $INTIF -p tcp --dport 3270 -j ACCEPT
$IPTABLES -t nat -A PREROUTING -i $EXTIF -p tcp --dport 3270 -j DNAT --to 192.168.10.1:3270


This is working now, provided that I use that specific IP address on the inside - I had to load the iptable_mangle module, which made my problems go away...

I don't understand how to add the ESTABLISHED,RELATED idea into this type of rule.

Something like this:

$IPTABLES -t nat -A PREROUTING -i $EXTIF -p tcp --dport 3270 -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED

???


Cheers,






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux