On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 12:27:07PM +0200, Harald Welte wrote: > On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 04:55:04PM -0700, Tom Marshall wrote: > > You can try this: > > > > http://home.tig-grr.com/rtsp/index.html > > Why did nobody submit that to patch-o-matic yet? Because I don't do patch-o-matic and nobody else has seen fit to do it, I suppose. > Another issue, to quote from the above URL: > > Please let me know if you use this module, and how it works for you. > > The more feedback, the more incentive to improve the module and try to > > get it into the mainline kernel. > > This is not possible. The netfilter coreteam strongly opposes including > conntrack/nat helpers for protocols where there is not at least one free > software client and server implementation. AFAIK, there is no free RTSP > server implementation so far. Please inform me, if I'm wrong. It's an IETF standard (well, RFC if you want to be technical). I don't care about your political games and I'm not going to bother hunting down a "free" (whatever your definition of that word) implementation. I'm sure they exist. If you don't accept a patch for a commonly used protocol that has RFC status, then you are doing a disservice to your users. -- A great many people think they are thinking when they are merely rearranging their prejudices. -- William James
Attachment:
pgp00594.pgp
Description: PGP signature
