RE: inconsistant behaviour

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ashley - you are setting your Default Policy with -P, and then immediately
flushing it with -F.  This is not what you want to do.  Flush first and set
your rules after that.  You will find the results much more to your liking.

-----Original Message-----
From: netfilter-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:netfilter-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Ashley Maher
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 10:05 PM
To: netfilter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: inconsistant behaviour


G'day,

I've built a firewall-gateway for a Uni.

The initial script sets up:

IPTABLES=/sbin/iptables

EXTIF="eth1"
INTIF="eth0"

echo "1" > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward

$IPTABLES -P INPUT ACCEPT
$IPTABLES -F INPUT
$IPTABLES -P OUTPUT ACCEPT
$IPTABLES -F OUTPUT
$IPTABLES -P FORWARD DROP
$IPTABLES -F FORWARD
$IPTABLES -N ACCT
$IPTABLES -F ACCT
$IPTABLES -N ALLOW
$IPTABLES -P ALLOW DROP
$IPTABLES -F ALLOW

$IPTABLES -A FORWARD -i $EXTIF -o $INTIF -m state --state
ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT
$IPTABLES -A FORWARD -j ACCT
$IPTABLES -I FORWARD -d 202.129.z.y -j ACCEPT
$IPTABLES -A FORWARD -s 203.220.a.0/22 -d 0.0.0.0/0 -o $EXTIF -j ALLOW
$IPTABLES -A FORWARD -s 203.220.b.0/24 -d 0.0.0.0/0 -o $EXTIF -j ALLOW
$IPTABLES -A FORWARD -s 203.221.c.0/25 -d 0.0.0.0/0 -o $EXTIF -j ALLOW
$IPTABLES -A FORWARD -s 203.220.d.0/25 -d 0.0.0.0/0 -o $EXTIF -j ALLOW
$IPTABLES -A FORWARD -s 203.220.e.128/25 -d 0.0.0.0/0 -o $EXTIF -j ALLOW

When a student logs on this instruction is given:

/sbin/iptables -A ALLOW -s $IP/32 -d 0.0.0.0/0 -o $EXTIF -j ACCEPT
/sbin/iptables -A ACCT -s 0.0.0.0/0 -d $IP/32 -i $EXTIF

This works well.

When a student logs off these instructions are given:

/sbin/iptables -D ALLOW -s $IP/32 -d 0.0.0.0/0 -o $EXTIF -j ACCEPT
/sbin/iptables -D ACCT -s 0.0.0.0/0 -d $IP/32 -i $EXTIF

Now this works fairly well. Less than 1% of the time it fails to remove
the entry from the ALLOW chain and very rearly it fails to remove from
the ACCT chain.

Where can I look to find this error. Though rare the 1% ends up being a
significant number given the load is high.

Also msn messagenger packets do not seam to be counted by the iptables
chain?? This is an observation from the help desk as students are
complaining they are being logged off for inactivity and they are using
messanger. When I hand check packets using iptables there appears to be
no packet count. Whe they do a download there is.

I'm not an iptables guru so hints and or suggestions appreciated.

thanks

Ashley







[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux