Re: MSN Messenger and HTTPS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 29 Aug 2003, Sturla Hallås - Zonar ANS wrote:
> I've set up my iptables firewall and of course, it's working perfectly.
> But...Clients on the LAN cannot log on to MSN Messenger, and they can't
> browse https-webpages like to do their banking.

Perhaps you didn't allow port 443 through the firewall for HTTPS.  Opening
up outgoing 443 should expose you to few threats.  Likely MSN Messenger
also needs a port opened.  Much of its functionality works through a single
TCP connection to the server, originated by the client, so opening that
port in the outward direction should (?) be safe.

> The thing is, the user can log on to their MSN-accounts through clients
> like Trillian, but not through MSN Messenger.

I'm talking through my hat here, but if a HTTP post sequence on port 80
were used to log the user in, that would work, whereas I'm sure that the
real Microsoft Passport protocol uses a different (and secure) port.  You
would have to discover what it was, and allow it through your firewall.  A
combination of web research and packet snooping with Snort or Ethereal
would give a quick conclusion.

If they're using H.323 for the audio-visual, like they do in NetMeeting,
that's a real can of worms, but I've seen people mention a H.323 netfilter
module that can make this work. Of course, the more complicated the
protocol is, the more likely that holes will be found and exploited sooner
or later.

James F. Carter          Voice 310 825 2897    FAX 310 206 6673
UCLA-Mathnet;  6115 MSA; 405 Hilgard Ave.; Los Angeles, CA, USA  90095-1555
Email: jimc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx    http://www.math.ucla.edu/~jimc (q.v. for PGP key)



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux