Re: Who is using the talk conntrack/nat helper?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thanks, James, for the NACK. But people, please only send ACK's if
applicable. NACK's to this question is only a waste of photon/electron.

Ramin
 
On Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 01:40:32PM -0700, Jim Carter wrote:

> On Sun, 24 Aug 2003, Harald Welte wrote:
> > So the big question is:  Does anybody actually use the talk
> > conntrack/nat helper modules?  If yes, are you satisfied with it's
> > functionality?
> 
> UCLA-Mathnet disabled the talk client and server on internal machines, due
> to reported security problems, and excessively risky baroqueness of the
> protocol, and we never did the research to find out if they were any better
> now then five or six years ago.  We don't care if you toss this module.
> 
> James F. Carter          Voice 310 825 2897    FAX 310 206 6673
> UCLA-Mathnet;  6115 MSA; 405 Hilgard Ave.; Los Angeles, CA, USA 90095-1555
> Email: jimc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx  http://www.math.ucla.edu/~jimc (q.v. for PGP key)


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux