It wouldn't throw it away if it had a route for it, would it? Since linux-router/eth1 has 10.0.0.250/24 assigned, wouldn't it forward out that one? On Thu, 2003-06-19 at 17:06, Daniel Chemko wrote: > You have to bind 10.0.0.1 to the network interface, or else the OS may > throw it away. > > ip addr add dev eth0 10.0.0.1 netmask 255.<whatever> > > Something like that. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Shawn [mailto:core@xxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 2:07 PM > To: netfilter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Is this correct? > > I have a, iptables statement I would just like someone to say if I have > it right. > > Let's say I have a linux box with eth0=10.0.0.250 and > eth1=192.168.0.250, and there's a host (192.168.0.1) connected to eth1. > I want to route connections from hosts in 10.0.0.0/24 land to 10.0.0.1 > onto the linux box's eth0, and have them NATed to 192.168.0.1 > > Will the following statement do that? > > iptables -t nat -I PREROUTING -i eth0 -d 10.0.0.1 -J DNAT \ > --to 192.168.0.1 > > >
