On Wed, 30 Apr 2003 03:38:12 +0200,
netfilter_user <netfilter_user@xxxxx> wrote in message
<1246491441.20030430033812@xxxxx>:
> Hello Arnt,
>
> Wednesday, April 30, 2003, 3:10:30 AM, you wrote:
>
> AK> On Wed, 30 Apr 2003 00:49:31 +0200,
> AK> netfilter_user <netfilter_user@xxxxx> wrote in message
> AK> <5436369716.20030430004931@xxxxx>:
>
> >> Rule: "iptables -A FORWARD -i eth1 -p udp -m --multioport --dport
> AK> /\
> AK> ..is " -m --multioport " a valid match in iptables, or a correct
> AK> quote of your attempt to write ' -m --multiport ' ?
>
> damn my wrong...it should looks like this:
> iptables -A FORWARD -i eth1 -p udp -m --multioport --dport 23073,23083
> -j ACCEPT /\
||
..lets try again: I don't find "-m --multioport" _anywhere_
in the docs, so, if you _actually_ try '-m --multioport' in
your rule set, it _should_ fail, then you'll wanna try
'-m --multiport', without your extra "o". ;-)
--
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;-)
...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry...
Scenarios always come in sets of three:
best case, worst case, and just in case.
