Re: Counter Strike FOWARDING?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 12:34:34PM -0800, SBlaze wrote:
> iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p TCP --dport 27015 -j DNAT --to-destination
> 192.168.1.25:27015

That rule is ok, but you should include a rule in the FORWARD chain which
actually allows the rule. Portforwarding is ok, as long as you don't forbid it
later:

iptables -A FORWARD -p tcp --dport 27015 -d 192.168.1.25 -j ACCEPT

Don't know if the Counterstrike-port is correct though... But i guess you know
what you're doing.

Alex.



-- 
"Mr Data, when I said 'Fire at Will', I didn't mean for you to be so literal."
Instructions for use of this post: Insert tounge in cheek. Read as normal.

Attachment: pgp00365.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux