Re: Prioritizing empty TCP ACKs?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Andre Costa <acosta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Prioritizing empty TCP ACKs?
From: Maciej Soltysiak <solt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2003 21:45:32 +0100 (CET)
Cc: Netfilter ML <netfilter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20030305151033.396b3e9a.acosta@ar.microlink.com.br>
References: <20030305151033.396b3e9a.acosta@ar.microlink.com.br>
Sender: netfilter-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

> Seemed pretty simple and effective to me. Is this possible at all with
> iptables on Linux?
I think i have seen the idea of prioritizing empty ACKs in "Linux Advanced
Routing & Traffic Control" @ www.lartc.org.
Check it out. tc with u32 is powerfull.

Regards,
Maciej

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Prioritizing empty TCP ACKs?
  - From: Andre Costa

References:
- Prioritizing empty TCP ACKs?
  - From: Andre Costa

Prev by Date: A netfilter question
Next by Date: Re: Quick Routing question
Previous by thread: Prioritizing empty TCP ACKs?
Next by thread: Re: Prioritizing empty TCP ACKs?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Netfilter Development] [Linux Kernel Networking Development] [Netem] [Berkeley Packet Filter] [Linux Kernel Development] [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control] [Bugtraq]

Powered by Linux