* per j (perj8@hotmail.com) wrote:
> >apparently. I believe that *should* read:
> >while(hash_table[hash_result] != -1 &&
> >!(r_list[hash_table[hash_result]].addr == addr &&
> > (!r_list[hash_table[hash_result]].ttl ||
> >r_list[hash_table[hash_result]].ttl != ttl))) {
> >
> >Instead. Note that I also had to invert the ttl check, it should be
> >considered a collision when the ttl doesn't match and matching ttl has
> >been requested.
> >
>
> It's already inverted at '-1 && !(...)', so I'm using the original ttl
> check.
Oh, right, good point, thanks.
Stephen
Attachment:
pgp00357.pgp
Description: PGP signature
