Arnt Karlsen wrote, Wednesday, February 12, 2003 1:28 AM: > On Tue, 11 Feb 2003 15:56:32 +0000, > uniplex <uniplex@maximum-linux.net> wrote in message > <3E491D30.1000909@maximum-linux.net>: > > > > > Would something like this look a little better for you? > > > > RESERVED_NET="0.0.0.0/8 1.0.0.0/8 2.0.0.0/8 5.0.0.0/8 7.0.0.0/8 [...] > ..some of these above are redundant, and some (wintendos?) need > 255.255.255.255/32, play with 'ipcalc -bnmp 0.0.0.0/1' upwards. More to the point, and even worse, some of them are *wrong*. At a quick glance, 69/8, 81/8, 82/8, 219/8, 220/8 and 221/8 are *not* reserved. Some of them haven't been for nearly two years now. Adam
