On Wed, 5 Feb 2003 11:21:22 -0500, Khanh Tran <khanh@slc.edu> wrote in message <01CEA3A5B8B2D511890F0002A5870AEC64EBAE@EXCHANGE>: > I'm sure this is possible, but I just haven't gotten it to work right > by playing around with the settings. > > I've got three NICs in the firewall box. I've also got two routers > that go to the Internet via two separate lines (a T1 and a partial > T3). I've got my default gateway set on the linux box to go out via > the T3 and NAT setup for my clients to route out via that interface. > I'd like to know if it's possible to setup a failover route to > redirect clients out the T1 should the T3 not be available, even if > the router is. Here's the basic diagram: > > > (default route) > eth2 <---> |T3 Router| <---> Internet > LAN <---> eth1 |firewallBox| > eth1 <---> |T1 Router| <---> Internet > > > Khanh Tran > Network Operations > Sarah Lawrence College > > ..branching off this thread for another idea: T3 + T1 bonding, or some other bandwidth maximation scheme. Experiences, anyone? -- ..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;-) ...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry... Scenarios always come in sets of three: best case, worst case, and just in case.
