Re: Broken MS tcp new not syn: better to REJECT or DROP?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Phil Crooker <pcrooker@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Broken MS tcp new not syn: better to REJECT or DROP?
From: justin <cmbb@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 18:03:42 -0500
Cc: netfilter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <3E307456.70104@orix.com.au.>
References: <3E307456.70104@orix.com.au.>
Reply-to: justin <cmbb@xxxxxxxx>
Sender: netfilter-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Is there a web page somewhere on this subject you can point me at?
"broken ms tcp" ?

thanks -Justin

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Broken MS tcp new not syn: better to REJECT or DROP?
  - From: SBlaze
- Re: Broken MS tcp new not syn: better to REJECT or DROP?
  - From: Athan

References:
- Broken MS tcp new not syn: better to REJECT or DROP?
  - From: Phil Crooker

Prev by Date: Re: problems converting iptables script from eth2 ....
Next by Date: PPP over Ethernet (PPPoE)... what ports does it need open for netfilter?
Previous by thread: Re: Broken MS tcp new not syn: better to REJECT or DROP?
Next by thread: Re: Broken MS tcp new not syn: better to REJECT or DROP?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Netfilter Development] [Linux Kernel Networking Development] [Netem] [Berkeley Packet Filter] [Linux Kernel Development] [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control] [Bugtraq]

Powered by Linux