Re: NAT and log traffic

Arnt Karlsen <arnt@xxxxxxx> · Wed, 15 Jan 2003 19:54:14 +0100



On Wed, 15 Jan 2003 16:08:03 +0100, 
"Rob Sterenborg" <rsterenborg@xs4all.nl> wrote in message 
<FD8F124A387AD6119F7900A0D218B321019AC2@hslex01.hslbz.local>:

> I think that 10.20.0.0/23 does not cover all of 10.20.2.0/23,
>  10.20.4.0/23, etc...

..output of: $ ipcalc -bnmp 10.20.2.0/23
NETMASK=255.255.254.0
PREFIX=23
BROADCAST=10.20.3.255
NETWORK=10.20.2.0

-- 
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;-)
...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry...
  Scenarios always come in sets of three: 
  best case, worst case, and just in case.