OT: curious about eth0/eth1
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
I am curious about why people choose to make a certain interface internal
or external...
I have always made my "eth0" interface my inside interface.. and once I
have the box UP and RUNNING (and firewalled), then bring up my outside
interface "eth1" ... My primary network for smb/nfs/whatever is my inside
network (thus eth0)... The outside interface is just a "extra interface"
that I can add on (or move/change/delete) or even make it ppp0 if I happen
to be changing ISP's :)
I notice several people pick eth0 as their outside interface, and sorta "oh
yea" the rest of the inside network is on eth1. I know the linux kernel
could really care less what they are called, its mostly a "neatness" thing
I guess... Also it seems like that leaves your box open to attack from the
time it installs (if you do a NET based install) till the time you get
around to actually putting a firewall on it.
Again.. I am just curious as to why some do it one way.. and some the
other... the above is only MY opinion, and could be dreadfully wrong :)
Tommy
--
Tommy McNeely -- Tommy.McNeely@Sun.COM
Sun Microsystems - IT Ops - Broomfield Campus Support
Phone: x50888 / 303-464-4888 -- Fax: 720-566-3168
[Index of Archives]
[Linux Netfilter Development]
[Linux Kernel Networking Development]
[Netem]
[Berkeley Packet Filter]
[Linux Kernel Development]
[Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]
[Bugtraq]