Re: Trying to setup two ethernet cards with two websites

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Friday 03 January 2003 07:23 am, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
> > If you trust that nothing on the box is or ever will connect that
> > you don't want to, then output chain can just have an ACCEPT policy.
> >  If you
> > want to lock down to make it harder for a trojan or such to
> > communicate back from the box, you can set a DROP policy, then:
> >
> > iptables -A OUTPUT -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT
>
> just remember to allow incoming ICMP. Please? ICMP _is_ an integral
> part of IP, and shouldn't be blocked out!

The RELATED state does just this.  If you allow absolutely nothing in but 
tcp 80 and established, and absolutely nothing out but established, only 
the port 80 request and reply will get through.  If you also allow 
related out then so long as an 'established' connection exists then 
supplementary connections are accepted as well, like ICMP fragmentation 
control stuff.  The only /initial/ connection allowed in this 
mini-scenario is to destination port 80 with TCP, but once that 
connection is flowing then the server would be allowed to send related 
packets to the same client, even other ports or protocols, and they will 
get through regardless of whether they are explicitly accepted or 
explicitly dropped by the firewall.  That is the basic purpose of the 
RELATED state.  It's extended with helpers too consider things like FTP 
data to be related to FTP control, and the NAT functions are extended as 
well, but the whole idea of RELATED is to let through stuff that is, 
well, related.

j




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux