On Wednesday 11 December 2002 04:00 am, Reckhard, Tobias wrote:
> Munging both replies into one, my answers are inline.
>
> > > I expect you're trying to access the FTP server on
> > > 10.0.0.11 from the
> > > Internet by redirecting connections to the firewall's external IP
> > > address (203.100.100.1) to the FTP server.
> > >
> > > Take care of the FTP control connection:
> > > 2. Permit INPUT on the outside interface of the firewall to TCP
> > > port 21 with states NEW and ESTABLISHED
> > > 3. Permit OUTPUT on the outside interface of the firewall from TCP
> > > port 21 with state ESTABLISHED
> > > 4. In the PREROUTING chain use DNAT to redirect packets "-p tcp -d
> > > 203.100.100.1 --dport 21" (see point 2 above) to the internal
> > > server at 10.0.0.11.
> > > 5. Permit FORWARDing of those same packets with states NEW and
> > > ESTABLISHED. 6. Permit FORWARDing of response packets ("-s
> > > 10.0.0.11 --sport 21") with state ESTABLISHED.
> >
> > This wouldn't work at all. INPUT shouldn't enter into it at
> > all, unless
> > the DNAT fails, and OUTPUT only if a packet is required to leave the
> > firewall machine itself, IE if that is where the connection
> > is attempted from or to.
>
> The above takes care of the control connection only. Since the
> Internet machine believes it is accessing an FTP server on the
> firewall itself, the latter is addressed by its FTP control
> connection. This means that the packets cross the firewall's INPUT
> chain, before they can be DNATed in the PREROUTING chain. I'm not
> entirely sure about the outbound packets, but most things netfilter
> apart from NAT require symmetric rules, so I suppose you need an
> OUTPUT rule to match the INPUT one.
I don't see how this would be. The first chain that a packet entering
the firewall hits is mangle-PREROUTING, second is nat-PREROUTING. At
that point it is DNATted, and then hits a routing decision that
determines if it is local or not, IE INPUT or FORWARD. It should never
'cross' INPUT at all, unless my understanding (and most sources I've
read, and traversal tests performed) is faulty.
> [FTP data]
>
> Thanks for the info, but I know all about FTP data.. What did you
> think steps 7 through 15 in my recipe were for?
Apologies for this, somehow I lost track of the entire end of your
message. I snipped it off to reply about INPUT, and just kept on going
based on what I still had left, forgetting the remainder. Someday I'll
learn to pay more attention when writing 3am replies... (and 3:10 am
replies to those replies :^)
j
