On Friday 25 October 2002 4:38 pm, Berndt Sevcik wrote: > Thanks for the answer! > > We use two Internet Connections. So we need to splitt our Source > addresses over these. All our official addresses are sent via the slower > one and all private addresses and proxies are transmitted via the fast > line (neede NAT). > > Another interessting fact ist that ping times are exptremely good. We > have about 2ms between each Hop in the Chello Nertwork, better than > ever. > > We need source based routing, because we have to default gateways, one > for each internet connection. Okay, I understand. > Here our full configuration: > > route add -net ..... (local nets) > route add default gw 193.170.9.1 (first ISP) > > ip rule add from 10.0.0.0/8 table chello1 > ip route add feault via 192.168.158.101 table chello1 (second ISP) > ip rule add from 193.170.8.133 table chello1 > ip rule add from 193.170.8.134 table chello1 > ip route flush cash Ah. A little more than you posted last time :-) However I still don't see a reason for only 20% usage of a 10Mbit connection. How do you know the problem is not with your ISP ? Can you download at 10Mbit under any circumstances ? What makes you think is it NAT which is causing the performance problem ? Does the problem go away if you do not use NAT ? How busy is your box (what load average does uptime show) ? Are you getting any kernellogging messages about conntrack table full etc ? What speed CPU / how much memory is in the netfilter machine ? Antony. -- All matter in the Universe can be placed into one of two categories: 1. things which need to be fixed 2. things which will need to be fixed once you've had a few minutes to play with them
