assymetrical routing, iptables problem.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 3 Oct 2002, Cedric Blancher wrote:

> You really should use a GRE tunnel between your two routers and route
> your 1.1.1.1 IP directly through it. I use it quite often when migrating
> hosts from one location to another (physically or logically) without
> havin to change IP addresses.

What I want here is a half-tunnel, of a sort. GRE Tunnels does not do
this, as far as I can tell.

>
> Note that you can also use packet MARK packets to identify them using
> mangle table which prevents you to alter layer 4 stuff. You can also use
> this MARK to route packets using iproute (see LARTC).
>
> > The problem is, the latter half of this doesn't work. What I really want
> > is SNAT in OUTPUT, as I believe that POSTROUTING won't touch packets that
> > originate on the local machine.
>
> SNAT on POSTROUTING will also affect locally originated packets as they
> get through this chain.

OK, this is good to know, there is something else going wrong than I had
thought.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux