Ok. I found the lookup order as: wins lmhosts bcast Which is how a windows client would connect. (except it would read lmhosts first). This needs to work not only for smbclient but also for any windows machines in the 192.168.0.x network. And adding a lmhosts to each machine is not really an option except as an absolute last resort. I need the system to be able to resolve netbios names via broadcast if at all possible. I still don't see why a request to 192.168.0.255 would fail. Here's the log fragments when I run smbclient //myserver/shared1 -U myuser: (resolve order = wins lmhosts bcast) Nov 26 20:33:22 mail last message repeated 2 times Nov 26 20:34:03 mail kernel: IN=lo OUT= MAC=00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:08:00 SRC=127.0.0.1 DST=127.0.0.1 LEN=78 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=64 ID=0 DF PROTO=UDP SPT=32814 DPT=137 LEN=58 Nov 26 20:34:07 mail last message repeated 2 times Nov 26 20:34:09 mail kernel: IN=lo OUT= MAC=00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:08:00 SRC=192.168.0.2 DST=192.168.0.2 LEN=90 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=64 ID=0 DF PROTO=UDP SPT=137 DPT=32814 LEN=70 Nov 26 20:34:10 mail last message repeated 2 times Nov 26 20:34:10 mail kernel: IN=lo OUT= MAC=00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:08:00 SRC=64.122.31.38 DST=64.122.31.38 LEN=90 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=64 ID=0 DF PROTO=UDP SPT=137 DPT=32814 LEN=70 Any ideas, anyone? -- Dan ----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael" <mutk@iprimus.com.au> To: "Dan Egli" <dan@shortcircuit.dyndns.org>; <netfilter@lists.netfilter.org> Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 6:14 PM Subject: Re: Samba blocked? > Dan Egli wrote: > > >Ok. I'm a fair bit confused here. I'm trying to setup a IPtables filter set > >that will block certain ports and allow others. It seems to work perfectly > >for anything other than Samba. If I try: > > > >smbclient //myserver/shared1, it fails to connect. But using the IP in place > >of it: > >smbclient //192.168.0.2/shared1 works just fine. I am specifically allowing > >NetBIOS-ns, NetBIOS-ssn, and NetBIOS-dgm. Still no go. What's wrong? > > > > > > > > > Probably nothing wrong with the iptables rules. Might be something wrong > with the name lookups for smbclient though. > Have a look at man pages for smbclient, in particular the name resolve > order (-R) command switch. Also have a look at man page for smb.conf, > as the method for name look ups is defined there (The order too) > > The default order is lmhosts, host, wins, bcast for name look ups. > I beleive that for bcast name lookups to work you need to allow bcast > traffic too. ie you need to allow 192.168.0.255 port 137. > > If you don't want that, a quick fix is to try adding the 'myserver' > name and IP to /etc/hosts .. > > Cheers, > Michael > > > > >