IPTABLES vs Checkpoint

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Wayne,

How are the firewalls installed? In a cluster configuration or stand alone?

In a stand alone you can go with either. If you're looking for scalability
and use of
things like VPNs, I'd go with Checkpoint. If you're looking for a stable
stateful firewall, you'd be
better off with iptables/netfilter.

The Nokia IPSO is not that bad. It is a stripped down version of BSD. So,
you're going to end up
with a stateful / Unix firewall no matter how you look at it.

-----Original Message-----
From: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org
[mailto:netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org]On Behalf Of Wayne de
Nobrega
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 2:28 PM
To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: IPTABLES vs Checkpoint


Hello,

I have a customer who is part of an international group which has a
policy of using the Nokia Checkpoint firewall.  Due to the signifcant
cost differences, and our preference, the local branch and ourselves
would like to install an IPTABLES based firewall.  I need some help in
motivating this to head office and am looking for information comparing
the two solutions.  I need to focus on the technical issues of the two
products and ultimately the inherent security realised from the two
products.

Can anyone offer some input or point me to a source of information.

Many thanks

Wayne




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux