Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > AFAICS we only need to update < 10 dump files, > > so churn is not too bad. > > > > Alternative is to always store postprocessed > > dumps and then always run sed before diff, but I think > > its better to do the extra mile. > > rbtree going leaks a raw count of independent interval values which is > going to be awkward to the user. Sure, wasn't that the reason why you iniitially wanted to restrict this to --netlink=debug? What made you change your mind? Maybe apply the simpler, existing v1 patches only, i.e. no exposure? I can just send a v2 with the new attribute names and no getter for libnftnl.
