Re: [PATCH nft 2/2] debug: include kernel set information on cache fill

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Nov 21, 2024 at 10:24:27AM +0100, Florian Westphal wrote:
> Florian Westphal <fw@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >         set y {
> > >                 type ipv4_addr
> > >                 size 256        # count 128
> > >                 ...
> > > 
> > > We have to exposed the number of elements counter. I think this can be
> > > exposed if set declaration provides size (or default size is used).
> > 
> > OK,  I will update libnftl then because this means it will need
> > proper getter for nft sake.
> 
> There is a problem with this, shell tests break:
> 
> W: [DUMP FAIL]    9/430 tests/shell/testcases/sets/0057set_create_fails_0
> 
> cat /tmp/nft-test.latest.root/test-tests-shell-testcases-sets-0057set_create_fails_0.11/ruleset-diff
> --- tests/shell/testcases/sets/dumps/0057set_create_fails_0.nft 2024-11-21 09:46:16.888431831 +0100
> +++ /tmp/nft-test.20241121-101956.182.zWvUOZ/test-tests-shell-testcases-sets-0057set_create_fails_0.11/ruleset-after    2024-11-21 10:20:00.046431831 +0100
> @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
>  table inet filter {
>         set test {
>                 type ipv4_addr
> -               size 65535
> +               size 65535      # count 1
>                 elements = { 1.1.1.1 }
>         }
> 
> As shell tests coud run on old kernel, regen dump file won't work.
> 
> Only options I see is to add a feature test file for this support,
> and then either disabling dump validation if it failed or adding
> additonal/alternative dump file.

Oh right, tests!

Probably tests/shell can be workaround to remove # count X before
comparing output.

It won't look nice, but I think tests/shell can carry on this burden.
This means # count N will not be checked in old and new kernels.

To validate # count N, we can still rely on tests/py and the debug
output as you propose.

Not great, but does this sound sensible to you?

Thanks.




[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux