Phil Sutter <phil@xxxxxx> wrote: > We could get rid of the nc->call != NULL check by assigning such stub in > nfnetlink_subsys_register(). OK, technically it would just move the NULL > check. Without such stunts, nfnetlink_rcv_msg() would have to remain > as-is to cover for future users with holes, right? I think we should leave it as-is, I thought this was the first use of NULL .call but as you found thats not the case.
