Phil Sutter <phil@xxxxxx> wrote: > > This relies on implicit NFNL_CB_UNSPEC == 0 and nfnetlink > > bailing out whe NFT_MSG_NEWDEV appears in a netlink message > > coming from userspace. > > I guess with 'implicit NFNL_CB_UNSPEC == 0' you mean the extra > nf_tables_cb array fields' 'type' value being 0 (nfnetlink.h explicitly > defines NFNL_CB_UNSPEC value as 0). I don't see the connection here > though, probably I miss nfnetlink_rcv_msg() relying on that field value > or so. I should have been more clear, I was wondering if we need/want an -EOPNOTSUPP stub callback rather than reliance of nfnetlink to detect it. > I see at least NFNL_MSG_ACCT_OVERQUOTA missing from nfnl_acct_cb. The > former was introduced in 2014. May I claim grandfathering? ;) I guess it just means "no we don't worry about it".
