Add test that validates behaviour of Landlock after rule with
unhandled access is added.
Signed-off-by: Mikhail Ivanov <ivanov.mikhail1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
Changes since v2:
* Replaces EXPECT_EQ with ASSERT_EQ for close().
* Refactors commit title and message.
Changes since v1:
* Refactors commit message.
---
.../testing/selftests/landlock/socket_test.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 33 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/socket_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/socket_test.c
index 811bdaa95a7a..d2fedfca7193 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/socket_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/socket_test.c
@@ -351,4 +351,37 @@ TEST_F(protocol, rule_with_unknown_access)
ASSERT_EQ(0, close(ruleset_fd));
}
+TEST_F(protocol, rule_with_unhandled_access)
+{
+ struct landlock_ruleset_attr ruleset_attr = {
+ .handled_access_socket = LANDLOCK_ACCESS_SOCKET_CREATE,
+ };
+ struct landlock_socket_attr protocol = {
+ .family = self->prot.family,
+ .type = self->prot.type,
+ };
+ int ruleset_fd;
+ __u64 access;
+
+ ruleset_fd =
+ landlock_create_ruleset(&ruleset_attr, sizeof(ruleset_attr), 0);
+ ASSERT_LE(0, ruleset_fd);
+
+ for (access = 1; access > 0; access <<= 1) {
+ int err;
+
+ protocol.allowed_access = access;
+ err = landlock_add_rule(ruleset_fd, LANDLOCK_RULE_SOCKET,
+ &protocol, 0);
+ if (access == ruleset_attr.handled_access_socket) {
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, err);
+ } else {
+ EXPECT_EQ(-1, err);
+ EXPECT_EQ(EINVAL, errno);
+ }
+ }
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(0, close(ruleset_fd));
+}
+
TEST_HARNESS_MAIN
--
2.34.1
