Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Passing this via net-next rather than nf-next for this reason. > > Either tree works, FWIW. > > I presume we should add these to the netdev CI, right? After all scripts have been updated it would be great if you could do that, yes. ATM too many nf tests barf for various reasons. > Assuming yes - I need to set up the worker manually. A bit of a chicken > and an egg problem there. The TARGET must exist when I start it > otherwise worker will fail :) These missed the > net-next-2024-04-12--00-00 branch, I'll start the worker first thing in > the morning.. Let me know how I can help.
