Re: nftables documentation improvement?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Harald,

On Sat, Mar 23, 2024 at 09:54:50AM +0100, Harald Welte wrote:
> Dear netfilter project,
> 
> In my recent interaction explaining nftables to some other users I am
> under the impression that there is likely some improvement possible to
> the nftables wiki.
> 
> The wiki is full of details about the individual expressions, actions,
> etc. - but I think what's lacking (or I couldn't find it) is some kind
> of conscise overall description of the terminology + the general
> high-level architecture of the ruleset.
> 
> You can find some description in the first two paragraphs of 
> https://wiki.nftables.org/wiki-nftables/index.php/Simple_rule_management
> but that doesn't define the terms used (action, expression, statement,
> ...)
> 
> You can find an overview of the terms used in
> https://wiki.nftables.org/wiki-nftables/index.php/Quick_reference-nftables_in_10_minutes
> [but then actually with imprecise language like "rule refers to an
> action to be configured within a chain." while a rule actually consists
> of matching expressions and an action"]
> 
> I'd be willing to try to write a proposed improvded text expressing what
> I have in mind.  I'd prefer to do that as some separate wiki page as a
> draft for you guys to review before deciding whether to use it in the
> main wiki pages.  I just didn't want to write it as unformatted
> plain-text here in e-mail and then later have to re-format in wiki
> syntax.

That's fine, I should have written that already myself, your help is
welcome on this.

> So in short: If anybody would be willing to add an account for me, I'd
> give it a shot and you can decide if you think what I'd consider an
> improvement is also one in your point of view.

Just sent you credentials in a private email.

Thanks.




[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux