On Fri, Nov 03, 2023 at 11:56:52AM +0100, Phil Sutter wrote: > On Fri, Nov 03, 2023 at 11:49:30AM +0100, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 03, 2023 at 11:44:43AM +0100, Phil Sutter wrote: > > > On Fri, Nov 03, 2023 at 10:59:25AM +0100, Phil Sutter wrote: > > > [...] > > > > One would have to change it to work based on *.y branches and the actual > > > > commits in there. I'll give it a quick try, shouldn't be too hard > > > > indeed. > > > > > > Please kindly find attached a "stable branch fork" of > > > collect_backports.sh. I was too lazy to check its output for missing > > > commits, but the ones it returns seem entirely valid. > > > > Would you mind to post the list of missing commits in 1.0.6.y? > > > > I am too lazy to run it. > > > > eac68b84227a3fc46572f3bae1113eaa91d13f24 taken. > 8519ab031d8022999603a69ee9f18e8cfb06645d taken. > 4e8aa050312822400124260bf6b630c3c05cb04d taken. > f65b2d12236174d477c55e96c4027cd51185ba5e skipped for tests/shell. > 122dce6b35205a3df419a5cae9acfd6e83e8725a taken. These two below, I don't find in my tree (script woes!): > e4c9f9f7e0d1f83be18f6c4a418da503e9021b24 > d392ddf243dcbf8a34726c777d2c669b1e8bfa85 > > Cheers, Phil
