Phil Sutter <phil@xxxxxx> wrote: > > However, this is stalling writers and I don't think we need this > > according to the problem description. > > ACK. Maybe Florian has a case in mind which requires to serialize reset > and commit? No, spinlock is fine too, concurrent resets will just burn more cycles. I did not think we'd have frequent resets which is why I suggegested reuse of the existing lock, thats all. No objections to new mutex or spinlock.
