Re: [PATCH -stable,5.15 2/2] netfilter: nf_tables: unbind non-anonymous set if rule construction fails

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jul 06, 2023 at 12:56:32AM +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> Hi Greg,
> 
> On Wed, Jul 05, 2023 at 10:23:27PM +0200, Florian Westphal wrote:
> > Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 05, 2023 at 04:14:11PM +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> > > > [ 3e70489721b6c870252c9082c496703677240f53 ]
> > > > 
> > > > Otherwise a dangling reference to a rule object that is gone remains
> > > > in the set binding list.
> > > > 
> > > > Fixes: 26b5a5712eb8 ("netfilter: nf_tables: add NFT_TRANS_PREPARE_ERROR to deal with bound set/chain")
> > > > Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > >  net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c | 2 ++
> > > >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> > > 
> > > But what about kernels newer than 5.15?  Surely this is also needed
> > > there as this only is going to first show up in 6.5-rc1, which hasn't
> > > been released yet.
> > 
> > Yes, do you need a backport? The commit cherry-picks cleanly to
> > 6.1.y, 6.2.y and 6.3.y.
> 
> Yes, if possible please cherry-pick:
> 
>   3e70489721b6 ("netfilter: nf_tables: unbind non-anonymous set if rule construction fails")
> 
> to:
>         6.1.y
>         6.2.y

Great, all now queued up. thanks.

greg k-h



[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux