Hi Greg, On Wed, Jul 05, 2023 at 10:23:27PM +0200, Florian Westphal wrote: > Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 05, 2023 at 04:14:11PM +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > > > [ 3e70489721b6c870252c9082c496703677240f53 ] > > > > > > Otherwise a dangling reference to a rule object that is gone remains > > > in the set binding list. > > > > > > Fixes: 26b5a5712eb8 ("netfilter: nf_tables: add NFT_TRANS_PREPARE_ERROR to deal with bound set/chain") > > > Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c | 2 ++ > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > > > But what about kernels newer than 5.15? Surely this is also needed > > there as this only is going to first show up in 6.5-rc1, which hasn't > > been released yet. > > Yes, do you need a backport? The commit cherry-picks cleanly to > 6.1.y, 6.2.y and 6.3.y. Yes, if possible please cherry-pick: 3e70489721b6 ("netfilter: nf_tables: unbind non-anonymous set if rule construction fails") to: 6.1.y 6.2.y 6.3.y Thanks.