Re: CPU soft lockup in a spin lock using tproxy and nfqueue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Major Dávid <major.david@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi all, Hi Pablo,
> 
> Following comments on bug: https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1662
>
> I researched a little bit further. I started to use older kernels from
> Ubuntu mainline PPA to get a rough estimate about affected kernel versions.
> At kernel version v3.18.140 still getting a soft lockup, I spun up a good
> oldie' Ubuntu Precise VM environment to test older kernels. No nftables
> support in Precise so I ported my test ruleset to iptables:
> 
> iptables -t mangle -F
> iptables -t mangle -X

Thanks, this is a bug in nft_tproxy.c.

Can you test following fix?

Thanks!

Subject: netfilter: tproxy: fix deadlock due to missing BH disable

The xtables packet traverser performs an unconditional
local_bh_disable(), but the nf_tables evaluation loop does not.

Functions that are called from either xtables or nftables must assume
that they can be called in process context.

inet_twsk_deschedule_put() assumes that no softirq interrupt can occur.
If tproxy is used from nf_tables its possible that we'll deadlock
trying to aquire a lock already held in process context.

diff --git a/include/net/netfilter/nf_tproxy.h b/include/net/netfilter/nf_tproxy.h
--- a/include/net/netfilter/nf_tproxy.h
+++ b/include/net/netfilter/nf_tproxy.h
@@ -17,6 +17,13 @@ static inline bool nf_tproxy_sk_is_transparent(struct sock *sk)
 	return false;
 }
 
+static inline void nf_tproxy_twsk_deschedule_put(struct inet_timewait_sock *tw)
+{
+	local_bh_disable();
+	inet_twsk_deschedule_put(tw);
+	local_bh_enable();
+}
+
 /* assign a socket to the skb -- consumes sk */
 static inline void nf_tproxy_assign_sock(struct sk_buff *skb, struct sock *sk)
 {
diff --git a/net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_tproxy_ipv4.c b/net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_tproxy_ipv4.c
--- a/net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_tproxy_ipv4.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_tproxy_ipv4.c
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ nf_tproxy_handle_time_wait4(struct net *net, struct sk_buff *skb,
 					    hp->source, lport ? lport : hp->dest,
 					    skb->dev, NF_TPROXY_LOOKUP_LISTENER);
 		if (sk2) {
-			inet_twsk_deschedule_put(inet_twsk(sk));
+			nf_tproxy_twsk_deschedule_put(inet_twsk(sk));
 			sk = sk2;
 		}
 	}
diff --git a/net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_tproxy_ipv6.c b/net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_tproxy_ipv6.c
--- a/net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_tproxy_ipv6.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_tproxy_ipv6.c
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ nf_tproxy_handle_time_wait6(struct sk_buff *skb, int tproto, int thoff,
 					    lport ? lport : hp->dest,
 					    skb->dev, NF_TPROXY_LOOKUP_LISTENER);
 		if (sk2) {
-			inet_twsk_deschedule_put(inet_twsk(sk));
+			nf_tproxy_twsk_deschedule_put(inet_twsk(sk));
 			sk = sk2;
 		}
 	}



[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux